| The Mercurian Empire http://www.hermertia.com/ |
|
| DB:35 Maritime Travel: Gallen, Wysteria to Acholm, Ostlaed http://www.hermertia.com/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=849 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Petra Ravnikaar [ July 21st, 2016, 11:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | DB:35 Maritime Travel: Gallen, Wysteria to Acholm, Ostlaed |
Maritime Travel Route: Gallen, Wysteria to Acholm, Ostlaed Details here, please look to check over it and see if you are satisfied. http://hermertia.com/viewtopic.php?f=63&t=836 I vote in favour of this. |
|
| Author: | Wysterian Labourer's Council [ July 21st, 2016, 11:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: DB:35 Maritime Travel: Gallen, Wysteria to Acholm, Ostla |
This legislation has my vote! |
|
| Author: | Flanders [ July 22nd, 2016, 12:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: DB:35 Maritime Travel: Gallen, Wysteria to Acholm, Ostla |
This has my vote to shut Nick up |
|
| Author: | Arcel [ July 22nd, 2016, 4:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: DB:35 Maritime Travel: Gallen, Wysteria to Acholm, Ostla |
This has my vote. |
|
| Author: | Sodihv Thalion [ July 23rd, 2016, 4:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: DB:35 Maritime Travel: Gallen, Wysteria to Acholm, Ostla |
DorEryn votes in favor |
|
| Author: | The Chairman [ July 25th, 2016, 8:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: DB:35 Maritime Travel: Gallen, Wysteria to Acholm, Ostla |
Having reviewed the proposed route (in amidst) and having determined it does not exist (though an alternative, yet more circuitous route does) and that this application therefore lacks the picture evidence of a lorified water route as required by clause 3, subclause A of the Maritime Fast-Travel Law, I must regrettably vote NO. I request that the Council of the Crown change their votes per subclause A of the Redaction clause of the Act on Kingdom Activity and Status which permits a vote change if it is "found to be unlawful or based on misinformation". Otherwise, I request Minister of Justice Siden Rua begin the process of reviewing the lawfulness of the passage of this legislation and encourage him to nullify the vote. Finally, I request that the Minister of Surveyors and Civil Engineers ensure that applications are properly vetted and that applicants ensure they accurately present information to prevent such things in the future. |
|
| Author: | Petra Ravnikaar [ July 25th, 2016, 11:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: DB:35 Maritime Travel: Gallen, Wysteria to Acholm, Ostla |
We've already established that we're painting in a river for Wysteria. Why would we exclude Wysteria from the world (that already has tonnes of rivers and routes in it anyway) because of some small issue which will be resolved soon and adds nothing to the experience of hermertia to not include such a feature. The entire point of this fast travel idea was to make the game more inclusionary. Yes the river isnt there yet, but it is and has been agreed upon in mumble to have been allowed for this purpose. It will be made more clear in the future but world painting requires a little bit of time from a busy Siden. |
|
| Author: | The Chairman [ July 26th, 2016, 12:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: DB:35 Maritime Travel: Gallen, Wysteria to Acholm, Ostla |
There is no mention of that river being painted in on the forums. We have already established that that which is discussed on mumble is only valid if subjected to discussion on the forums as well, so the river painting should have been mentioned in the original application. Also, I will reiterate that an alternate route is available, so Wysteria does not need to be excluded. |
|
| Author: | Petra Ravnikaar [ July 26th, 2016, 1:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: DB:35 Maritime Travel: Gallen, Wysteria to Acholm, Ostla |
Fair point, There is a river there but it isnt exactly the best river due to shoddy minecraft generation. Where's the alternate route? |
|
| Author: | Petra Ravnikaar [ July 26th, 2016, 1:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: DB:35 Maritime Travel: Gallen, Wysteria to Acholm, Ostla |
We'll be sure to include that the next time for other applications. Thanks for the heads up on this matter. It shall be applied as it should be for the sake of clarity and completeness. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|